LOCAL PLANNING MATTERS
Appeal by 29 Piercing Hill EPF/0173/25 As reported in our last article, this application for demolition of existing side extensions and garage, construction of two-storey side and rear extensions and creation of basement, also to include an enlarged roofscape, of this locally listed, Metropolitan Green Belt, dwelling, was refused by EFDC. The applicant appealed this decision, and TBAG submitted a strong objection. The appeal was dismissed by the Planning Inspector on 20 January 2026. The main reasons for the Inspector’s refusal were: impact on the openness of the green belt, the effect of bulky additions on a heritage asset due to the proposed additions not being subservient to the host building, and the potential detrimental impact on the setting of the neighbouring group of locally listed Manor Villas, of which this property is one. From reading the report, TBAG believe that this inspector was a specialist planning inspector for heritage assets as well as having the usual extensive planning qualifications.
Green Belt Fields behind Theydon Bois Station, Abridge Road Following the somewhat disquieting confirmation from EFDC that an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening Opinion – for a proposed residential development of up to 150 dwellings, associated infrastructure and landscaping – would not be required, no planning application has been received. The land is currently designated Metropolitan Green Belt in our local plan until 2033, and only Government changes to the planning regime would override this security. We understand that the same decision that no EIA is needed, has been taken for green belt farmland at Stewards Green Fields, Epping east.
GOVERNMENT PLANNING SITUATION
A further Government planning consultation concerning the Government’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is now open and closes on 8 March 2026. The NPPF has already been altered many times since it was first introduced on 27 March 2012 and it continues to evolve and its goalposts are constantly altered! TBAG will be submitting comments with particular reference to Chapter 13, Protecting Green Belt Land. TBAG consider that the proposed changes to this Chapter will downgrade the security and permanence of the Green Belt that we have today.
TBAG are strongly opposed to the Labour Government’s idea that all that is needed is to get a planning approval for “outline permission” and then fill in the crucial details afterwards. TBAG are of the opinion that this knee-jerk approach by Government will override local democracy by removing the right for Town and Parish Councils, interest groups and residents to comment, with the benefit of local knowledge, on specific aspects of yet to be disclosed detailed plans.
The whole thrust of the Labour Government’s planning policy changes is to allow developers to be able to obtain outline planning permission by default, claiming that this will speed up the planning process. Yet there are still 1.4m extant planning permissions for new homes as yet unbuilt by developers who landbank and drip-feed properties onto the market to keep prices high. Government appear to be deliberately ignoring this ‘elephant in the room’.
EFDC has commissioned a Green Belt/Grey Belt review by Arup, outside consultants, looking at which areas of green belt could be classed as grey belt, and their justification. Surprisingly, this review is being funded by Central Government! The completion date is to be the end of March. Epping Forest Heritage Trust are apparently very concerned about this review.
TBAG are fundamentally opposed to any local Government reorganisation that removes the freedom of local residents to object to any proposed developments in their area.